Call Summary
- 15 Sep, 16:30BR-30% · Fatal
Fatal: foreclosure rule misstated to win a balance transfer, cover pushed as a condition
A balance-transfer campaign call built on a rule that was removed in 2019. The RM told the customer his existing bank would charge 2% to foreclose a floating-rate home loan in his own name and quantified it at Rs 63,000 — the correct figure is nil. When the customer said a friend had told him there was no charge, she overrode him and told him his own bank would confirm her version. She then presented a Rs 1,12,000 loan protection cover as the condition for the 8.85% rate, with a 25 bps penalty for refusing, and when the customer said he already had a 50-lakh term plan she told him it was a different thing. The call closed with a 30 September deadline pushed at a customer who had just said he needed to think.
“Existing loan Rs 31,40,000 at 9.35% floating with another bank · Ravvio offer 8.85% floating · officer states the existing bank will charge "2% foreclosure, about 63,000" on a floating-rate individual home loan · loan protection cover Rs 1,12,000 presented as required for the rate”
Rakesh Deshmukh
How each stage of the call scored
The stage scores above show how the officer did on each part of the call. A fatal breach is zero-tolerance, so it sets the whole call score to 0, whatever the stage scores were: Call 1 scored 52% on its stages → 0% (2 fatals).